Sunday, September 30, 2007

How to get Hillary elected.

Splitting the Republican party would be a paramount act of stupity and would in fact create the situation they are trying to prevent... President Hillary Clinton and her advocacy for murdering little human beings as a right of 'choice'. ( Notice how the high ideal of choice is diminished when she talks about health care ? )

Republicans would do well to recall that in 92 Perot siphoned off votes that George Bush would have received and consequently Bush would have defeated Clinton by a comfortable margin. Instead Clinton was elected as a minority candidate and because of Perot we had to deal with eight long and tiring years of the Clinton follies.

Then again this article could just be liberal propaganda... it is, after all, from the New York Times.

Friday, September 28, 2007

Great Moments In Liberal History


George Soros Creates the Open Society Institute

We've all heard the harping from the Left about a 'Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy'. Not just any conspiracy but a 'vast' conspiracy and I guess it must be true.

Rarely mentioned is its counterpart on the Left. Heading ( funding ) the camp is Soros.

David Horowitz has a site called Discover The . He was slammed and ridiculed almost immediately by a heavy barrage from the intellectual left at sites like this. Now I must be fair here and add that I have a hard time believing all these people, on either side, meet in a 'Star Chamber' setting discussing how they are going to conquer the world.

I also think that simply having a common cause hardly rises to the nefarious implications of a conspiracy.

There is a certain degree of admiration that I have for an immigrant like Soros that came to America and made his mark. That's about where it ends for my positive opinion of him. What does concern me is the fact that large dollars can buy an American political party and be used to manifest the social concepts of an eccentric billionaire. The very type of thing the Left characterizes the Republicans as being.

So let's hear from the owner of the DNC concerning the frat party at Abu Ghraib. I thought about dubbing crowd chants of 'Sieg Heil' at the points of applause but they are doing such a good job I didn't bother.

Here's the Clip---> THE CLIP

For all those hinting about constitutional change so Arnold can be President ... So too could Soros.

We Don't Need No Education...

Here we find a group of Berkeley freshemen memorizing the answers to their Adavanced Government Studies for the Gifted course final.

** Sorry for rippin off the title but I just happen to be listening to 'The Wall' while I was doing this. Mere coincidence ? Yep that's how it queued.

Weekly Devotional

Daniel 11:31:

And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily [sacrifice], and they shall place the abomination that maketh desolate.

Starting at Mark 13:13:

And ye shall be hated of all [men] for my name's sake: but he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved. But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not, (let him that readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judaea flee to the mountains:

And let him that is on the housetop not go down into the house, neither enter [therein], to take any thing out of his house:

And let him that is in the field not turn back again for to take up his garment.

But woe to them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!
And pray ye that your flight be not in the winter.

For [in] those days shall be affliction, such as was not from the beginning of the creation which God created unto this time, neither shall be.

And except that the Lord had shortened those days, no flesh should be saved: but for the elect's sake, whom he hath chosen, he hath shortened the days.

And then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here [is] Christ; or, lo, [he is] there; believe [him] not:

For false Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if [it were] possible, even the elect.

But take ye heed: behold, I have foretold you all things.

From the Koran: ( Isa is Jesus )

[43.63] And when Isa came with clear arguments he said: I have come to you indeed with wisdom, and that I may make clear to you part of what you differ in; so be careful of (your duty to) Allah and obey me:

[61.6] And when Isa son of Marium said: O children of Israel! surely I am the apostle of Allah to you, verifying that which is before me of the Taurat and giving the good news of an Apostle who will come after me, his name being Ahmad, but when he came to them with clear arguments they said: This is clear magic.

Bit of a contradiction. Mohammed's mistake was using Judaism and Christianity as a basis for his religion because those religions invalidate the possibility of another messiah after the Messiah ( the Alpha and Omega ).

Now how does one communicate that nuance to the ignorant masses with a 6th century mentality and tell them that what they believe in and die for is the machinations of a false prophet?

No wonder the Saudi's won't allow Bibles into the kingdom.

Thursday, September 27, 2007

General Observations...

because I can't think of anything else to blog about.

I've read in passing about last night's Democrat debate # 4,965. I caught some clips on FoxNews and noticed that now they are now talking about giving up on Iraq towards the end of their first term instead of immediatley. Richardson the end of his first term but who really cares what the inconsequential candidates think ? I think the three possible viable candidates Clinton, Obama and Edwards who will have talked themselves into a quandry in the coming months. Especially as the Iraq conflict begins to wind down into an useasy peace.

Their first problem is that their party is extremely skewed to the left where traditional Democrats, the last vestiges of what used to be referred to as conservative Democrats, drift away from the absurdities of the left-wing lunatics like Kos and (Soros' poodles). These would be the older Democrats that go to church on Sunday and remember a more sane and honorable Democratic party. I would call them the JFK Democrats. Though they too may show mild symptoms of BDS they still honor their country, have a sense of duty to country and as grownups would never allow the Kos Kidz and the other influencial children of the party to have power. These people may possibly be drawn to Clinton but may balk at Edwards or Obama because of their youth and inexperience. They may even be drawn to Thompson much in the way of the Reagan Democrats.

The second problem is that all their prognostications of gloom and doom in Iraq are not going to pan out and will cause two problems. One exposing their lack of the right stuff of leadership and the other being their willingness to modify their stance as events change in Iraq. Eventually Clinton will be telling us she was for it all along.

Clinton being the most likely to win the nomination will have to face her past. I am sure that the Republicans have polished the big guns and have them safely stored away until both nominees are selected. Then we'll hear about Vince Foster, for something is afoul surrounding that whole affair. We'll see her in her full pandering glory because, unlike Edwards and Obama, she does have a record.

If I were a debate commentor or interviwer there is one question/point I would like to pose to her. In her testimony on the Rose Law Firm/Whitewater affair she said some 200+ times that she couldn't recall, couldn't remember or wasn't sure. So my point would be why should we elect, as leader of the free-world, someone that has that bad of a memory or is that deceptive.

I've noticed that on some blogs Democrats go ballistic when their party is called the Democrat party. They will insist it be called the Democratic Party. Ok then... if members of the Republican party can be called Republicans why not call members of the Democratic party Democratics ? But I do understand that consistentcy is not an attribute of the leftist mind.

Kucinich... what the hell is wrong with the people in the district that keeps eleting him? Many of my clients are in all parts of Ohio and I think they are very normal and intelligent people. Is there some dark vortex of less-than-bright people that others in Ohio have fled from leaving only Darwin fodder?

Dan Rather... A lot like watching Brittney come crashing down or Elvis getting fat and drugged out. Sad watching the suicide of a legacy.

Got a good chuckle out of Ahmindeedanutjob propoganda at Columbia about Iran respecting international law... of course most of the libtards that were applauding him have not a clue about the 1979 act of war he was part of.

Saturday, September 15, 2007

The 'Greenspan Awakening'

Drudge is running a Red Light Banner.. Greenspan says Iraq war was about oil.

No shi'ite sherlock! The question being whether Iraq's oil reserves would be controlled by a belligerent genocidal sociopath or a duly elected democratic government.

There are many more reasons for removing the regime of which this is just one. For me his igorning 17 UN resolutions, his attempted assassination of GHW Bush, his genocide of the Kurds and Shia, his abrogation of the 91 cease fire agreement, his attack on Kuwait, his burning of the oil wells and dumping oil in the Arabian Gulf, his payments to young Palestinian murder's families, his harboring and training of terrorists, his quest for more lethal weaponry were sufficient reasons to attack him. So why not throw the 'Greenspan Awakening' in for good measure?

Of course this plays into the hands of the historically-challenged neo-leftists but I have news for them... almost every major war in history has been about the control of resources. Whether it is Spice, Drugs, Steel, Food, Living Space or Oil. This is why Japan attacked us.. we stopped sending them steel and other comodities. Hitler attacked Romania and Russia for Oil. The British went to war with China over Opium and eventually created an empire to control natural resources as did the Romans, the Greeks, , France, Spain... nothing new here folks. The entire American history is predicated on control of resources.

But to the clueless 'progressive' moonbat this will just appear to validate their BDS.
I mean, for them, history is so... yesterday.

Friday, September 07, 2007

Withdraw the troops...from Korea

President Bush's response should have been..."We too look forward to the day the Korean conflict is over so we can withdraw out troops from the Korean Penninsula."